This is interesting because Sir Isaac Newton formulated these Laws from simple observations, exactly akin to the observations on this blog.
No, the apple did not fall on his head.
Here are the Laws:
The qualifying terms are: “Body”, “Force”, “Translated”, “Velocity”, “Momentum”, “Action”, “Reaction”. However, definitions will follow more easily if the “common sense” Laws are given first.
N1: “If you push a stopped thing it goes, and if you don’t, it won’t.” and
“ If you push something already going, it will either slow down or speed up, depending on which way you push.”
N2: “F = ma” or “Force equals mass times acceleration”
N3: “Push something and it will push back”.
N1: Every thrown ball slows down and stops, because of air resistance.
N2: If you keep your foot down on the gas pedal in a car, it will get more and more fast.
N3: In empty space, if an astronaut pushes another astronaut, both will move away from each other at the same rate.
“Body” = anything that can move.
“Force” = a constant pushing.
“Translated” = moved in a straight line.
“Velocity” = speed in one direction only.
“Momentum” = mass x velocity
“Action” = a particular push.
“Reaction” = a particular push back.
Well, these are they. Apply these in the right way, and a lot of problems can be solved about things that move.
The trouble is, knowing which one to use in each situation.
There are more ways of formulating the Laws, but as given, the first set are the “official” versions, whereas the second set are the “normal “ versions that everyone has heard at least once.
The most used is the second. It crops up everywhere. Especially interesting is the case of applying it to a space rocket being launched, but that involves a real knowledge of calculus to solve (clue – you actually need the “official” version of N2, the “normal” N2 is insufficient!).
As a nuclear scientist, I use N1 quite a bit.

5 comments:
Hi Akiko,
Can I ask a simple question?. If you are walking in the North-East direction, which direction is the "friction" working?
Amit
Friction is a fictitious force invented to explain why things slow down. If you are walking in a North-East direction, friction acts to oppose this in the opposite direction, South-West.
If our "frictious you" is moved forward by a strong wind in the direction already mentioned, will the fictious force called friction be reduced on our "frictious you"? If so, would it theoretically be possible for our "frictious you" to become frictionless--much like a superconductor---if the wind became strong enough? Please pardon my play on words in giving "you" a name.
I got you there Aki. Friction does oppose action (which is Force). Therefore, If we are walking in North-East direction the Force has to be applied to the South-West. As friction, a vector quantity, opposes force it acts in the same direction as one is moving...i.e. North-East. Any comments?
No it doesn't. It may act along the same vector, ie the NE-SW vector, but acts oppositely, ie "points" "backwards" along the SW direction.
If it didn't, friction would "help" us move, not oppose it, and we would have created energy from nothing.
Post a Comment